Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Wright v. Unum Group
as 3:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Sharalyn Wright
Defendant:
Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Greger v. Unum Group et al
as 8:2015cv01975
Plaintiff:
Michael Greger
Defendant:
Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company and Unum Group
Fryer v. Unum Group et al
as 3:2015cv04781
Plaintiff:
Jefferey W Fryer
Defendant:
Unum Group and Trustmark Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Mahoney v. Unum Group et al
as 3:2015cv03532
Plaintiff:
Gayle Mahoney
Defendant:
Unum Group , Unum Life Insurance Company Of America and The Commissioner of the California Department of Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West v. Unum Group
as 2:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
Brian R West
Defendant:
Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aminifard v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Nasreen Aminifard
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Magno v. Unum Group et al
as 3:2014cv05041
Plaintiff:
Rose Magno
Defendant:
Unum Group , Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Dave Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knuth v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2014cv02387
Plaintiff:
Randall Knuth
Defendant:
Paul Revere Life Insurance Company , Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company and Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Esquibel v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2014cv01323
Plaintiff:
Christina Esquibel
Defendant:
Unum Group and Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Turner v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv01205
Defendant:
Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Unum Group
Plaintiff:
Lee R. Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
