Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Karen Friedland v. Unum Group
as 14-3244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN FRIEDLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNUM GROUP, a Delaware Corporation, and it's wholly owed subsidiary and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO OF AMERICA
D'AGOSTINO v. UNUM GROUP
as 1:2014cv04028
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA D'AGOSTINO
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
AYALON v. THE UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2014cv03819
Plaintiff:
DAN AYALON
Defendant:
THE UNUM GROUP and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
HUSAINI v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2014cv00636
Plaintiff:
SYED N. HUSAINI
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MPHJ Technology Investments LLC v. Unum Group
as 1:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
MPHJ Technology Investments LLC
Defendant:
Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GROSS v. THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2013cv06277
Plaintiff:
DAVID GROSS
Defendant:
THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE CO. , UNUM CORPORATION, UNUM GROUP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Friedland v. Unum Group et al
as 1:2013cv01417
Plaintiff:
Karen Friedland
Defendant:
Unum Group and Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SIGAL v. THE GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. SIGAL
Defendant:
THE GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Manfredonia v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2012cv07607
Plaintiff:
James A. Manfredonia
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WATT-MORSE v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2012cv01086
Plaintiff:
MARGARET WATT-MORSE
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
