Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Upson Family Trust vs. M/V Job Site III
as 2:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
UPSON FAMILY TRUST
Defendant:
M/V JOB SITE III, a 2005 Sea Ray 550 Sedan, HIN: SERY1275D505, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture, and equipment appertaining and belonging in rem, & DEVERE DENNINGS and CAROLE DENNINGS, in perso, M/V Job Site III, Devere Dennings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
AMC Cobb Holdings, LLC et al v. Plaze, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04865
Defendant:
Apollo Aerosol Industries LLC and Plaze, Inc.
Plaintiff:
AMC Upson Holdings, LLC, AMC Whitfield Holdings, LLC and AMC Cobb Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Souran et al v. Hayes
as 1:2018cv01033
Plaintiff:
Thomas C Souran and Marisa Upson
Defendant:
Braden Katherine Hayes
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Amponsah et al v. Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 0:2011cv61233
Plaintiff:
Charity Amponsah , David Amponsah , Olman Roy Arriaga, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company , The Law Offices of William H. Batallas, P.A. and William H. Batallas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Upson County Hospital Inc v. National Healing Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
Upson County Hospital Inc, Upson County Hospital Inc and Upson County Hospital Inc
Defendant:
National Healing Corporation and National Wound Care and Hyperbaric Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
National Wound Care and Hyperbaric Services Inc v. Upson County Hospital Inc
as 5:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
National Wound Care and Hyperbaric Services Inc and National Wound Care and Hyperbaric Services Inc
Defendant:
Upson County Hospital Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Upson v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 4:2008cv01449
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Upson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
