Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Qunni v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2022cv00967
Plaintiff:
Tareq N. S. Qunni
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Terri Robinson
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Kim v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kyung Tae Kim
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ann Marie Jordan-Starks
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Aminu v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Suraka Yahaya Aminu
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ann Marie Jordan-Starks
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Trower et al v. Blinken et al
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jill Trower and Adam Trower
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tazin v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Zubaer Alam Tazin
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of State, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Singh v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2021cv01425
Plaintiff:
Amarjit Singh
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Rudy Lara
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Alejrish v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2021cv01082
Plaintiff:
Shahad Alejrish
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Kathy Baran
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
