Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Vigil v. Crowther et al
as 1:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Chelsie Vigil
Defendant:
Scott Crowther and State of Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey et al v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00956
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Massey and Jacqulyn Massey
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections, Rollin Cook, Daniel B. Harman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Julio Guerrero, The et al v. Crowther et al
as 2:2016cv00857
Plaintiff:
Estate of Julio Guerrero, The and Hilda Guerrero
Defendant:
Scott Crowther , State of Utah and Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tirri v. Utah Department of Corrections
as 2:2016cv00668
Plaintiff:
Ralph Tirri
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maughan v. Burnham et al
as 2:2016cv00458
Plaintiff:
Ryan Darley Maughan
Defendant:
Bruce O. Burnham, Utah Department of Corrections, Kathy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Starks et al
as 2:2015cv00754
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Davis
Defendant:
Donovan Starks and Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00627
Petitioner:
Barry James Snyder
Respondent:
Scott Crowther and State of Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Utah Department of Corrections
as 2:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Davis
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacilio v. Utah Department of Corrections Board and Parole Members et al
as 2:2015cv00233
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Bacilio
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections Board and Parole Members, Curtis L. Garner, Angela Micklos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacArthur v. Garden et al
as 2:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Bret Golden MacArthur
Defendant:
Richard Garden, Kennon Tubbs, Aaron Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
