Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Pickmeup Medical Transport v. Utah Department of Health et al
as 2:2013cv00846
Plaintiff:
Pickmeup Medical Transport
Defendant:
Utah Department of Health , Division of Healthcare Financing , Utah Department of Administrative Services and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holli Lundahl v. Albert Hawkins, et al
as 09-51163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOLLI TELFORD LUNDAHL, also known as Holli Telford
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERT HAWKINS, Commissioner for the Department of Health and Human services for the State of Texas, ANDREW ARNOTT, Employee of the Utah Department of Health and Human Services, LEONORE LOPEZ, Employee of the Utah Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Echols et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 2:2007cv00791
Plaintiff:
William Echols, William Echols, Saneh L. Echols and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Utah State Office of Education, Utah Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juarez v. State of Utah, et al
as 06-4254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARITA JUAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, Department of Health - Family Dental Plan
Defendant:
ANDREA HIGHT and ERICA VEKTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
