Cases 1 - 6 of 6
In re: MCP No. 204; FCC, Reducing Barriers
as 26-3599
Petitioner:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK, RURAL COUNTY REPRESENTATIVES OF CALIFORNIA and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Utility Reform Network, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.
as 26-3946
Petitioner:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK, RURAL COUNTY REPRESENTATIVES OF CALIFORNIA and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2026cv03148
Plaintiff:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company doing business as AT&T California
Defendant:
John Reynolds, Darcie L. Houk, Karen Douglas and others
Amicus Curiae:
USTelecom - The Broadband Association, Rural County Representatives of California, The Utility Reform Network and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Greenlining Institute, et al v. FCC
as 17-73283
Petitioner:
GREENLINING INSTITUTE, PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE, THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC et al v. Picker et al
as 3:2016cv02461
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC , Pacific Bell Telephone Company , California Cable & Telecommunications Association and others
Defendant:
Michael Picker , Mike Florio , Catherine J. K. Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pub Util Cmsn CA v. FERC
as 97-1028
Petitioner:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Mojave Pipeline Company, Southern California Utility Power Pool, Imperial Irrigation District and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Southern California Gas Company, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Utility Reform Network and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
