Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Agarwal v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05680
Plaintiff:
Avantika Agarwal
Defendant:
Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Cheng v. Merritt et al
as 4:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
Abby Cheng
Defendant:
Douglas S. Merritt, Jason E Child, Sara J. Baack and others
Flannery v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Flannery
Defendant:
Graham V. Smith, Stephen G. Newberry, Patricia B. Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv09879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wolk v. Merritt et al
as 4:2021cv01116
Defendant:
John G. Connors, Sri Viswanath, Elisa A. Steele and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Wolk
Tandon et al v. Newsom et al
as 5:2020cv07108
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Jeffrey V. Smith, Sandra Shewry and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wong, Carolyn Gannon, Julie Evarkiou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaghashia Family Limited Partnership et al v. Prashant Vaghashia et al
as 2:2019cv01876
Defendant:
Mita Vaghashia, Nidhi Vaghashia, Vaghashia Family Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherman Oaks First Plaza, LLC and Vaghashia Family Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Federal State and Local Corpora Ficta Employees et al
as 3:2017mc80061
Plaintiff:
Fareed Sepehry-Fard
Defendant:
Federal, State and Local Corpora Ficta Employee(s ), Lucy H. Koh, Edward J. Davila and others
Ke v. Brown et al
as 3:2017cv01687
Plaintiff:
Hui Lian Ke
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Laurie Smith, Kamala D. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
