Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, Warden R SHROPSHIRE, C MIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, C MIMS, R SHROPSHIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson et al v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Rodrick L. Richardson, Charles Low, Walter Christian and others
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Superior Courts, Georgia Public Defender Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughlin v. Nail et al
as 1:2019cv02124
Petitioner:
Keven McLaughlin
Respondent:
V. Williams and Michael W. Nail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. PULASKI STATE PRISON et al
as 7:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, CARLTON POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. PULASKI STATE PRISON et al
as 7:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE MOORE
Defendant:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, CARLTON POWELL, V WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. GRADY COUNTY SHERIFF AND SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
GRADY COUNTY SHERIFF AND SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CARLTON POWERS, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01643
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
VICKS v. JAMES et al
as 7:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
BEN VICKS, JR
Defendant:
RON JAMES, V Williams and LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillon v. Rollins et al
as 7:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Michael Chad McMillon
Defendant:
F. Rollins and V. Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
