Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BRAY v. LAUGHLIN
as 3:2015cv00065
Petitioner:
DAVID VERNON BRAY, JR
Respondent:
V. LAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia-Ponce v. Laughlin
as 5:2013cv00095
Plaintiff:
Marin Garcia-Ponce
Defendant:
V. Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonardo v. Laughlin et al
as 5:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Walter Joel Leonardo
Defendant:
V. Laughlin, Brayan Callahan, Unknown Coplen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mota v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2011cv00092
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mota
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inmate/Resident Files, Inc., Adams County Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Camara v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv00026
Petitioner:
Ousseynou Camara
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kassimov et al v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv00022
Petitioner:
Abdul Kassimov
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hasanaj et al v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv00017
Petitioner:
Marko Hasanaj
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Raymond A. Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Naushad et al v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv00015
Petitioner:
Caulamnabi Momin Naushad
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Irabor v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv00007
Petitioner:
Nelson Irabor
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, John A. Mata and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
