Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6381
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6229
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Henry v. Paige et al
as 7:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Henry
Defendant:
Treandre D. Paige, VA DOC Department of Correction, Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cumber v. VA. DOC
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
William Edward Cumber, III
Respondent:
VA. DOC and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
VA Doc Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Warden
as 23-7121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, of Red Onion State Prison, HAROLD W. CLARKE, VA DOC Director and KYLE ROSCH, VADOC Interstate Compact Administrator
Turner v. VA DOC
as 3:2023cv00735
Petitioner:
Diallo O. Turner
Respondent:
VA DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, VA D.O.C. Director, RANDALL C. MATHENA, VA D.O.C. Security Operations Manager, H. SCOTT RICHESON, Deputy Dir., VA D.O.C. and others
Robert Via, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6732
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT KING VIA, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA-DOC
Shearin v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Charles McCoy Shearin
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, VA Dept. of Corr., Administrative Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
