Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Conrad Burke v. Harold Clarke
as 12-7941
Petitioner - Appellant:
CONRAD BURKE
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VA. Dept. of Corrections
Timmons v. VA Dept. of Corrections
as 7:2012cv00527
Plaintiff:
Larrell D'mitric Timmons
Defendant:
VA Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. VA Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2012cv00562
Petitioner:
Larrell D'mitric Timmons
Respondent:
VA Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timmons v. VA Dept. of Corrections
as 7:2012cv00449
Petitioner:
Larrell D'mitric Timmons
Respondent:
VA Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lyndrell Hawkins v. R. Mathena
as 12-6870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNDRELL DEMOND HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. C. MATHENA, Chief Warden, MR. KISER, Assistant Chief Warden, MR. MCBRIDE, Institution Doctor and others
Nottingham v. VA Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2012cv00067
Petitioner:
Antalf Nottingham
Respondent:
Director, VA Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haga v. Director, Va. Dept. of Corrections
as 7:2012cv00023
Respondent:
Director, Va. Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner:
Ralph E. Haga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheeler v. Western Virginia Regional Jail et al
as 7:2011cv00521
Defendant:
VA Dept. of Corrections and Western Virginia Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
James E. Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marvin Grimm, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7332
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARVIN LEON GRIMM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director VA. Dept. of Corrections
Waddy v. Sandstrom et al
as 7:2011cv00320
Defendant:
Officer Justus, Sandstrom and VA Dept of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Waddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
