Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jeffrey Mitchell v. Lt. Cooke
as 26-6795
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JAMEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
LT. COOKE, OFFICER MUNCY, OFFICER RYAN EDWARDS and others
David Meyers v. US
as 26-6684
Petitioner:
DAVID MEYERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Meyers v. Almarale et al
as 7:2026cv00474
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
J. Almarale, N. Halcomb, J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 7:2026cv00416
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
A. Duncan, D. Anderson, M. Pozeg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Bolling et al
as 7:2026cv00411
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Bolling, E. Shirks, Major J.B. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. White et al
as 7:2026cv00346
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
Rick White, Beth Cabeil, B. Belling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Department of Corrections Directors-VADOC et al
as 7:2026cv00274
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
Department of Corrections Directors-VADOC, VADOC Director Joseph Walters, VADOC Director Ryan McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Anderson et al
as 7:2026cv00244
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
D. Anderson, James Parks, Rose Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Meyers v. D. Nelson
as 26-6322
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
OFFICER MR. D. NELSON, MR. DAVIS, SERGEANT MR. FILIMORE and others
David Meyers v. Michael Pozeg
as 26-6326
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL POZEG, WRSP Cheif of Housing and Programs, DAVID ROSE, The WRSP-A.D.A- Coordinator and Operations Manager, DAVID ZOOK, WRSP Chief Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
