Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Meyers v. Anderson et al
as 7:2026cv00244
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
D. Anderson, James Parks, Rose Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Meyers v. Samuel Caughron
as 26-6321
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
SAMUEL CAUGHRON, W.R.S.P. Unit Manager, MICHAEL POZEG, J. ARTRIP and others
David Meyers v. Ewing
as 26-6324
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
EWING, Sergeant, Wallens Ridge State Prison Hearing Officer, OFFICER NELSON, CHRISTOPHER KING and others
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 7:2026cv00167
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
Assistant Warden Amee Duncan, VADOC Deputy Director, Hearing Officer J. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Meyers v. T. Hall
as 26-6175
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MAJOR T. HALL, Wallens Ridge State Prison, M. POZEG, LT. MR. PAULEY and others
David Meyers v. J. Artrip
as 26-6118
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
J. ARTRIP, UNKNOWN D6-600 POD OFFICERS, D-BUILDING, Wallens Ridge State Prison, UNIT MANAGER S. CAUGHRON and others
Meyers v. Dotson et al
as 7:2025cv00770
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
C. Dotson, Interstate Compact Administrator, Warden D. Zook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Ewing et al
as 7:2025cv00769
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Ewing, Officer Nelson, Christopher King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Caughron et al
as 7:2025cv00639
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Samuel Caughron, Michael Pozeg, J. Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Hall et al
as 7:2025cv00044
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Major T. Hall, M. Pozeg, Lt. Mr. Pauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
