Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
VURIMINDI v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2023cv03282
Petitioner:
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
Respondent:
ERIN MORGAN, PHILADELPHIA ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
VURIMINDI v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2023cv00882
Petitioner:
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
Respondent:
ERIN MORGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04182
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Diana Anhalt, et al
as 20-3393
Defendant:
JUDGE DIANA LOUISE ANHALT, JUDGE LAWRENCE O'CONNOR, JUDGE LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE O'CONNOR, Esq., SUPERVISING JUDGE LEON W. TUCKER, PRESIDENT JUDGE IDEE FOX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
Vamsidhar VurimindiIn re: Vamsidhar Vurimindi
as 20-3304
Respondent:
CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Petitioner:
In re: VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
VURIMINDI v. ANHALT et al
as 2:2020cv05368
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
Defendant:
LAWRENCE O'CONNOR, ESQ, LAWRENCE KRASNER, ESQ, JUDGE DIANA L. ANHALT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03357
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
