Cases filed in Pennsylvania
VAN DYKE et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67650
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. VAN DYKE, JR. and DIANE STRINGER
Defendant: PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. , SOUTHERN TEXTILE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAN DYKE et al v. CLEVELAND CLIFFS IRON COMPANY
as 2:2011cv40636
Plaintiff: ARTHUR W VAN DYKE , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: CLEVELAND CLIFFS IRON COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
VAN DYKE et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv40637
Plaintiff: ARTHUR W VAN DYKE , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BOWMAN v. VAN DYKE
as 5:2011cv00109
Plaintiff: WALTER F. BOWMAN, IV
Defendant: RICHARD E. VAN DYKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. v. VAN DYKE
as 5:2010cv03925
Plaintiff: AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant: DANIEL VAN DYKE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
TAGGART v. FRANCONIA TOWNSHIP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02725
Plaintiff: KENNETH J TAGGART
Defendant: FRANCONIA TOWNSHIP , FRANCONIA SEWER AUTHORITY , KEVIN D. BAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01590
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VAN DYKE v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv70926
Plaintiff: JIMMIE VAN DYKE
Defendant: ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Banks v. Green et al
as 1:2007cv00021
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: D. Green, Walter Harris, Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?