Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03017
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03018
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3288
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vargas v. St Management Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv09692
Defendant:
Steve Tenedios and St Management Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hector Vargas
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7434 IRS: Civil Damages for Fraudulent Filing of Information
Vargas v. Indivior Inc., et al.
as 1:2026sf65186
Defendant:
Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior Inc., and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC
Plaintiff:
Raymond Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vargas v. Ball Pipe and Supply, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv03883
Defendant:
Gary Leroy Allen, Jr and Ball Pipe and Supply, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julio Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03426
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09137
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02705
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
