Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HAPPEL v. VENANGO COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HAPPEL
Defendant:
VENANGO COUNTY PRISON, MARK BISHOP, UPMC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
HAPPEL v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY G. HAPPEL
Defendant:
WARDEN MARK BISHOP, DEPUTY WARDEN MICHAEL SCANNELL, NURSE ANGIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. WARDEN VENANGO COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2022cv00332
Petitioner:
ZERRIUS BOYD, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN VENANGO COUNTY PRISON, A.D.A. VENANGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SOLOMON v. WARDEN VENANGO COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
JOLENE NICOLE SOLOMON
Respondent:
WARDEN VENANGO COUNTY PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF VENANGO COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SWITZER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Petitioner:
KERRY LEE SWITZER, JR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK BISHOP, WARDEN VENANGO COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARTLE v. UPMC NORTHWEST et al
as 1:2019cv00087
Defendant:
UPMC NORTHWEST, SCI ALBION, OIL CITY POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG LEE HARTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANDERSON v. VENANGO COUNTY PRISON
as 1:2013cv00234
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R. ANDERSON
Defendant:
VENANGO COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CONKLIN v. VENANGO COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
GERALD CONKLIN
Defendant:
VENANGO COUNTY PRISON, SMITH and LYLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DEAN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2007cv00216
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY DEAN
Defendant:
B. SMITH and VENANGO COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
