Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner:
FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
VERSANT POWER et al v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER and ENMAX CORPORATION
Defendant:
WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Petitioner:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner:
FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
OLIVER v. VERSANT POWER et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN OLIVER
Defendant:
VERSANT POWER, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. FERC
as 20-1329
Petitioner:
Vermont Transco LLC, New England Power Company, d/b/a National Grid, Versant Power, f/k/a Emera Maine and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
