Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Visa Commodities AG v. Bluestone Coal Sales Corporation
as 7:2022cv00302
Petitioner:
Visa Commodities AG
Respondent:
Bluestone Coal Sales Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldstein v. Visa Corporate Offices et al
as 3:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
David S. Goldstein
Defendant:
Visa Corporate Offices and Ready Debit Visa Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lively v. VISA U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2015cv00603
Plaintiff:
Jody Lively
Defendant:
VISA U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DataCell ehf. v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01658
Plaintiff:
DataCell ehf.
Defendant:
Visa Inc., Visa Europe Limited and Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Barbour v. Disorder-Stanford 1994 Amendment to Immigration and Naturalization Act et al
as 7:2010cv00323
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Barbour
Defendant:
Citizens for Excellence in Education-- National Security Decision Directive 189, Disorder-Stanford 1994 Amendment to Immigration and Naturalization Act and People for the American Way-- Student Exchange Visa Information System (SEVIS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
