Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Shaw v. Dermatology Realm et al
as 2:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dermatology Realm, Clarx Big Country Dermatology, Memphis Dermatology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moran v. Vision Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Chasity Moran
Defendant:
Vision Hospitality Group, Inc. and Mitchell Patel
Rodgers v. Alcon Vision, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02197
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Renee Rodgers
Defendant:
Alcon Vision, LLC and Alcon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gage v. Vision Path
as 1:2022cv01196
Not Classified By Court:
Mary Bond Lonon
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gage
Defendant:
Vision Path
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Dalen Products, Inc v. Mount Vision, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Dalen Products, Inc
Defendant:
Mount Vision, LLC and Chi-Kun Lam
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mikel v. Nichols et al
as 1:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Jennifer Nichols, Omni Visions, Inc. and Department of Children's Services
Plaintiff:
Sheila Mikel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00071
Plaintiff:
Kayla D. Phillips
Defendant:
Alcon Vision, LLC and Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoffman et al v. Tennessee Dept. of Children Services et al
as 3:2020cv00900
Defendant:
Omni Visions, State of Tennessee and Tennessee Dept. of Children Services
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hoffman and Latasha Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02416
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
