Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Talley v. Valley Health System
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Margery Talley
Defendant:
Valley Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sherwood v. Valley Health System
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
James B. Sherwood
Defendant:
Valley Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Valley Health System v. Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Valley Health System
Defendant:
Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc. doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Sherwood v. Valley Health System
as 5:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
James B. Sherwood
Defendant:
Valley Health System
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Valley Health System v. Ramlawi
as 5:2021cv00022
Defendant:
Basel Ramlawi, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Valley Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roth v. Winchester Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00141
Defendant:
Valley Health System and Winchester Medical Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Susan Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Petition of Valley Health System and Winchester Medical Center
as 5:2013mc00004
Interested Party:
Christy Downs and Dena Kent
In Re:
Petition of Valley Health System and Winchester Medical Center
Grey v. Winchester Medical Center et al
as 5:2011cv00038
Defendant:
M.D. Kevin Shane Geib, Urology Associates of Winchester, Valley Health System and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Fey Grey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
