Cases 1 - 10 of 942
Scott v. Moving Solutions Van Lines LLC et al
as 4:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
Mignon Scott
Defendant:
Moving Solutions Van Lines LLC, New Destiny Moving Services LLC and All Coast Moving Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 11707 Carmack Amendment
Treasure Island Laguna Azure LLC v. City of Van Alstyne
as 4:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Treasure Island Laguna Azure LLC
Defendant:
City of Van Alstyne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trinh v. Tran
as 4:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
Minh-Tam Tammy Tran
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Trinh v. Pan et al
as 4:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
Dr Windsen Pan and Dr Ashley Pan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Trinh v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation
as 4:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation, Ted Smith, Robert Hambleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Trinh v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association et al
as 4:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association, Glenn Walker, Mr. Kenneth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
