Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Monro Muffler Brake & Service et al
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake & Service, Linda Fenstermaker, John Van Voris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jankowski v. Van Wickler et al
as 5:2019cv00195
Defendant:
Richard N. Van Wickler, John Doe #2 and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Adam Jankowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Van Eck v. Oliver et al
as 2:2019cv00116
Defendant:
John G. Oliver, III and Pamela A. Oliver
Plaintiff:
Linda Van Eck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Van Eck v. Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00232
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corporation, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jan Van Eck
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harmony Holdings, LLC v. Lounsbury et al
as 2:2018cv00203
Defendant:
Linda Van Eck, Ian Lounsbury, Jan Van Eck and others
Plaintiff:
Harmony Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aguiar v. Carter et al
as 2:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Stephen Aguiar
Defendant:
Richard Carter, Justin Couture, Jared Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lounsbury et al v. Credit Suisse (USA) Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Linda Lounsbury and Austin Van Eck
Defendant:
Credit Suisse (USA) Inc., DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Mead v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00151
Petitioner:
Terry Van Mead
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
