Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Rios-Rodriguez, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 19-1288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO C. OTERO-GONZALEZ, ERIKA MIRANDA-ACEVEDO, REBECA GONZALEZ-PEREZ and others
Defendant:
MARIA DEL CARMEN MURILLO-VELEZ, BUILDTECH CONTRACTOR CORP., DORAL MORTGAGE and others
Plaintiff:
GISELLE I. PASTRANA-CHICALNA, HECTOR PADILLA-MEDINA, MAYRA GONZALEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Doral Bank and ACE INSURANCE CO.
United States v. Vargas
as 4:2018mc94003
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jessica Vargas
United States of America v. $43,394.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 3:2018mc00040
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$43,394.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Daniel De Jesus-Vargas
US v. Vargas-Gonzalez
as 17-1689
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
GOODWIN VARGAS-GONZALEZ, a/k/a Gou
US v. Romero-Varga
as 17-1143
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
HUGO ENRIQUE ROMERO-VARGAS, a/k/a El Mocho, a/k/a El Mochito, a/k/a Kike
Vargas v. Session
as 17-1075
Petitioner:
JUAN PABLO VARGAS
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
US v. Vargas-Reye
as 16-2497
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
HECTOR OMAR VARGAS-REYES
Trigo-Gonzalez, et al v. Garcia-Padilla, et al
as 16-2440
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIONISIO TRIGO-GONZALEZ, CARMEN REGINA SUAREZ-SEIN, BENIGNO TRIGO-GONZALEZ and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FELICIANO VARGAS, FIRST MEDICAL HEALTH PLANS OF PUERTO RICO, INC. and EDUARDO ARTAU GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEJANDRO J. GARCIA-PADILLA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico, GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PUERTO RICO and others
Movant - Appellant:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
