Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Quarles v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Allan Quarles
Defendant:
James Youngkin, Eric Wiltrout, C.O. Trouchin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Pierre et al
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Edwin F. Vargas
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, Jill Cuffaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyahla, Sr. v. Youngkin, Sr. et al
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Tyahla, Sr.
Defendant:
James Youngkin, Sr., Derrick George, John Gablick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Christensen
as 1:2024cv00302
Petitioner:
Juan Benjamin Vargas
Respondent:
Warden D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VARGAS v. MCCAULEY
as 2:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
ANGEL TERRELL VARGAS, JR.
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. MCCAULEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos-Vargas v. Huntingdon Prison Administration
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Ramos-Vargas
Defendant:
Huntingdon Prison Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAMOS-VARGAS v. HUNTINGDON PRISON ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RAMOS-VARGAS
Defendant:
HUNTINGDON PRISON ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RAMOS-VARGAS v. WARD et al
as 2:2022cv04606
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RAMOS-VARGAS and JOSE L. RAMOS VARGAS
Defendant:
ESQ. ALEXANDER WARD, JUDGE MICHAEL KOURY and ALEXANDER WARD, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VARGAS-MARRERO v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv02342
Plaintiff:
JOSE RAUL VARGAS-MARRERO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, A. JORDAN, M. FEDDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
