Cases 31 - 40 of 306
Prudencio et al v. Triple R Construction Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv01202
Plaintiff:
Eric Prudencio, Anthony Prudencio, Moises Antonio Prudencio and others
Defendant:
Triple R Construction Corporation, Robert Leigh Rodriguez, Evelyn J. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Dina Vasquez Ramos v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1553
Petitioner:
DINA ABIGAIL VASQUEZ RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Vasquez Diaz v. Excellent International, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01146
Defendant:
Li-Ming Tai, Excellent International, Inc. doing business as Yuan Fu Vegetarian, Hisiuchu Tai and others
Plaintiff:
Zulma Vasquez Diaz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ismael Vasquez-Ruiz v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1489
Petitioner:
ISMAEL VASQUEZ-RUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Keydy Vasquez-Castro v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1285
Petitioner:
KEYDY BETZABE VASQUEZ-CASTRO and K.K.L.V
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Jose Reyes-Vasquez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1286
Petitioner:
JOSE DEL CARMEN REYES-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Yasmin Rivas De Nolasco v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1176
Petitioner:
YASMIN CLARIBAL RIVAS DE NOLASCO, ROUESELYN LILIANA VASQUEZ-RIVAS, G.E.N.R. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sibrian v. Superior Auto Detailing, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv00169
Defendant:
Xenia B. Rivera, Superior Auto Detailing, LLC, Xenia Montes and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Alfaro Sibrian
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
