Cases 11 - 20 of 196
Dobronski v. Kelly et al
as 2:2023cv10257
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
James Christopher Kelly Doing business as Trusty Quote Insurance Services Doing business as Leadzer, Joel Vasquez and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Arrington v. Mims et al
as 4:2022cv12765
Plaintiff:
Shondrey Arrington
Defendant:
Mims, Gibson, C. Bigelow and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vasquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03542
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Vasquez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vasquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03411
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Vasquez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vasquez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03111
Plaintiff:
Freddy Vasquez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vasquez v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv11415
Plaintiff:
Nicole Vasquez
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jeilyn Vasquez-Montepeque, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3311
Petitioner:
JEILYN ANNETH VASQUEZ-MONTEPEQUE and DORA ETELBINA MONTEPEQUE-NUNEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Vasquez v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01202
Plaintiff:
Felix Vasquez
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
