Cases 41 - 50 of 2,193
USA v. Francisco Martinez-Vasquez
as 24-10214
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER MARTINEZ-VASQUEZ
Dominguez-Guaraca v. Garland
as 24-93
Petitioner:
MANUEL ISSAC DOMINGUEZ-GUARACA, SCARLET VALENTINA DOMINGUEZ-VASQUEZ and TANIA CAROLINA VASQUEZ-MOROCHO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Vasquez
as 24-158
Defendant / Appellant:
JESSIE VASQUEZ and Pelon
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Vasquez-Landaver
as 24-1010
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GUILLERMO VASQUEZ-LANDAVER, a/k/a Jute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 24-106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, "OBSERVER", "Q" and others
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vasquez Trejo, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4446
Petitioner:
EDNA GUADALUPE VASQUEZ TREJO and DIANA LIZBETH GONZALES VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
A., et al. v. County of San Bernardino, et al.
as 23-4180
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J. A., a minor by and through his Guardian ad litem Cindy Plasencia, as successor in interest to Juan Antonio Ayon Ruiz, JOSE JUAN AYON ROMERO, parent of decedent and MARIA DOLORES RUIZ VASQUEZ, parent of decedent
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ED FAKHOURY, Deputy and BRANDON BECKER, Deputy
Vasquez Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4059
Petitioner:
HILDA ELUVIA VASQUEZ GONZALEZ and ROMEO SANTOS VASQUEZ GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
