Cases 41 - 50 of 64
VASQUEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv01422
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VASQUEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2015cv01265
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briscoe v. Lake County et al
as 2:2015cv00204
Plaintiff:
Jeramie Briscoe
Defendant:
Lake County, Judge Cappas and Judge Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. ROBERTS
as 2:2015cv00138
Defendant:
N. ROBERTS
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VASQUEZ v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00029
Respondent:
LARIVA
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Freeman v. Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner et al
as 3:2014cv01989
Plaintiff:
de'Carlos Freeman
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner, Bruce Lemmon, Mark Levenhagen and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. CARAWAY
as 2:2014cv00260
Respondent:
J. F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vasquez v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00544
Plaintiff:
Monica Vasquez
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. , Biomet Orthopedics, LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2013cv01389
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VASQUEZ v. KNIGHT
as 1:2013cv01394
Respondent:
MS. BLACK, WENDY KNIGHT, MIKE PAVESE and others
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
