Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sitaca et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Sitaca, Keith Daryl Goroza, Ashley Rollice and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Amazon Logistics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mahoney v. Federal Reserve Assocation et al
as 2:2016cv01599
Plaintiff:
John Francis Mahoney
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Assocation, Humana Hospital West Anaheim, Saint Jude Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Organo Gold Int'l, Inc v. Ventura et al
as 2:2016cv00487
Plaintiff:
Organo Gold Int'l, Inc
Defendant:
Luis Ventura, Luz Angela Ventura and L&A Ventura Management, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Ventura v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00980
Plaintiff:
Martin Ventura
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Creekmore v. Sound Transit et al
as 2:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
Brandon Creekmore
Defendant:
Sound Transit , Terrence Carpenter, Brenda E Ackers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00169
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01447
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ventura v. Burch et al
as 2:2011cv00059
Petitioner:
Arlene Ventura
Respondent:
Shelley Burch, Nina Repin and The Snoqualmie Tribal Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Ventura v. Snoqualmie Indian Tribe et al
as 2:2011cv00046
Petitioner:
Kanium Ventura
Respondent:
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe , Snoqualmie Tribal Police , Snoqualmie Tribal Prosecutor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
