Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Karriem v. Cellco Partnership Inc., d/b/a Verizon Wireless Inc.
as 2:2020cv00884
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership Inc., d/b/a Verizon Wireless Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lamont Garner Karriem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Verizon Enterprise Solutions, LLC, Verizon Business Global, LLC, Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01756
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Johnson v. Verizon Wireless Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05547
Plaintiff:
Carlos Johnson
Defendant:
Nicholas R Kazlauskas and Verizon Wireless Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taha Abouramadan v. USDC-CALA
as 19-72070
Not Classified By Court:
VERIZON WIRELESS, INC., In re: TAHA ABOURAMADAN, KELLY B. HANKER and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Petitioner:
TAHA ABOURAMADAN, AKA Taha Ramadan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01218
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Inc., Sprint United Management Company, T-Mobile USA Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Andrew Salazar
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
