Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Avington v. Verizon Wireless Services LLC
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Hondo H Avington
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Robertson v. Verizon Wireless Service, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Robin Robertson
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Service, LLC and The CBE Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Joe Bauman et al v. Cellco Partnership et al
as 3:2010cv03142
Plaintiff:
Joe Bauman and Desiree Vaughan
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP , Verizon Wireless Telecom Inc. and VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWERS et al v. VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2010cv02619
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM POWERS , DERRICK FRERICHS and JUST CONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC
as 2:2009cv00548
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Mitchell
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Smale et al v. Verizon Communications Inc et al
as 2:2007cv01639
Plaintiff:
Brian Smale, Brian Smale, Brian Smale and others
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc, Verizon Communications Inc, Verizon Communications Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CALLING ALL CELLULAR v. PAGING CONCEPTS, LTD, et al
as 2:2003cv04964
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, PAGING CONCEPTS, LTD., ADAM GITLITZ and others
Plaintiff:
CALLING ALL CELLULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Calling All Cel. v. Paging Concepts, et al
as 1:2003cv02425
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership, Paging Concepts, Ltd., Adam Gitlitz and others
Plaintiff:
Calling All Cellular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
