Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Doe v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
State of Vermont, Vermont State Hospital, Vermont Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
State of Vermont, Vermont State Hospital, Vermont Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGarry v. Pallito et al
as 1:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
Finbar McGarry
Defendant:
Andrew Pallito, Gale Hale, Richard Byrnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Vermont, State of et al
as 1:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
James T. Burke
Defendant:
Vermont, State of and Dennis Duffy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chandler v. LaPorte et al
as 2:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Christopher Loyzelle, Kraig LaPorte and Vermont State Police
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chandler v. Albright et al
as 1:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Eric Albright, Christopher Lora, John Waitekus and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chandler v. Clark et al
as 1:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Keith Clark, Windham County Sheriff's Department, Christopher Lora and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Lafayette et al
as 2:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Norman Lafayette, Kathleen Lafayette, Bristol, Town of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Burke v. Vermont, State of et al
as 2:2009cv00017
Plaintiff:
James T. Burke
Defendant:
Vermont, State of and Charles Cole
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wambolt v. State of Vermont
as 2:2008cv00250
Petitioner:
David M. Wambolt
Respondent:
Vermont, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
