Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Duncan v. Warden Via Lobos et al
as 4:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Robert H Duncan
Defendant:
Warden Via Lobos, Bryan Collier, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrow v. Unknown et al
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Estrellita Burrow
Defendant:
Unknown and VIA Transit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rios v. Perez et al
as 5:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Marc Rios and Marcos Rios
Defendant:
Christopher Perez, Amanda Lara, Joe Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VIA Metropolitan Transit v. Advertising Vehicles, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
VIA Metropolitan Transit
Defendant:
Advertising Vehicles, Inc. doing business as Adsposure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. VIA Technologies, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
VIA Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Trevino v. Peel et al
as 4:2022cv02330
Plaintiff:
Raul Adame Trevino
Defendant:
Mike Peel, Former Warden Smith, Grant Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AHBP LLC v. The Lynd Company et al
as 5:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
AHBP LLC
Defendant:
The Lynd Company and Via Clean Technologies LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Bio Supplies LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Kiboko, Inc. and Joseph Raich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Banks v. VIA Transportation et al
as 5:2021cv00924
Plaintiff:
Spencer Banks
Defendant:
VIA Transportation and VIA San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
