Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Brantner v. Collier et al
as 6:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
Carlton E. Brantner
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Bruce L. Armstrong, Justin S. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballentine v. Broxton
as 22-50437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Garland Ballentine
Defendant / Appellee:
Sergeant Heather Broxton, Jay Hart, SIGMO and Grievance Department Vicki Cundiff
Quintela v. Meyer
as 22-50251
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Edward Quintela
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Randall D. Meyer, Maggie Taylor, Heather Rios and others
Nelson v. McKenzie et al
as 6:2021cv01369
Plaintiff:
Quincy Nelson
Defendant:
Timothy McKenzie, Vicki Cundiff, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballentine v. Broxton
as 21-51043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Garland Ballentine
Defendant / Appellee:
Sergeant Heather Broxton, Jay Hart, SIGMO and Vicki Cundiff, Grievance Department
Yieson v. Akwitti
as 20-50923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ariel Yieson
Defendant / Appellee:
Laundry Officer, Hughes Unit, Maintenance Department, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Gatesville, R. Roberts and others
Yieson v. Akwitti et al
as 6:2020cv00823
Petitioner:
Ariel Yieson
Respondent:
Nurse V. Pollard-Fortson, Warden C. Akwitti, Milton Togo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Lighten et al
as 6:2020cv00775
Defendant:
Beau Smith, Sr., Pamela Taylor, Lawrence H. Lighten and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Lofton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garland Ballentine v. Heather Broxton, et al
as 20-50055
Defendant / Appellee:
VICKI CUNDIFF, Grievance Department, JAY HART, SIGMO and SERGEANT HEATHER BROXTON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARLAND BALLENTINE
Ballentine v. Broxton et al
as 6:2019cv00459
Defendant:
Grievance Dept. Vicki Cundiff, SGT Heather Broxton and Jay Hart
Plaintiff:
Garland Ballentine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
