Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Gwendolyn Hall et al v. Victor M. Gordo et al
as 2:2023cv08444
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall, Rashad Shabazz and Rashad Shabazz, Jr
Defendant:
Mayor Victor M. Gordo, Maynor Varela and Anne Lansing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Victor M. Morales v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2023cv03590
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Morales
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Rivera v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Rivera
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)
Orozco v. United States
as 5:2022cv07369
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Orozco
Defendant:
United States, A. Ocompo, J. Wooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lozada v. Ravitch et al
as 5:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Juliette Hyde, Matt Hennila, Jill Ravitch and others
Plaintiff:
Victor M Lozada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozada-Harker v. Sonoma County Superior Court et al
as 5:2021cv00451
Defendant:
Judge Bradford DeMeo, Sonoma County Superior Court and Judge Christopher Honigsberg
Plaintiff:
Victor M Lozada-Harker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozada v. Santa Rosa 800 Plaza Macy's Dept Store et al
as 5:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Santa Rosa 800 Plaza Macy's Dept Store and Matt Raaberg
Plaintiff:
Victor M Lozada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozada v. Santa Rosa Police Dept. et al
as 5:2021cv00460
Defendant:
Matt Meloche, R J Navarro and Santa Rosa Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Victor M Lozada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
