Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Obeginski v. Walker
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OBEGINSKI v. WALKER
as 5:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
WARDEN VICTOR WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton et al v. Ward et al
as 1:2023cv05836
Plaintiff:
Cedric Burton, Jasman Maxwell and Amber Griffin
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Victor Walker, Raymond Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Phillips
Defendant:
Unknown
Respondent:
Judge Blackmon and Warden Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv00176
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Respondent:
Victor Walker and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv00191
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Respondent:
Warden Victor Walker and Department of Corrections
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Walker
as 1:2021cv02700
Petitioner:
Bernard Green
Respondent:
Warden Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. SANDERSVILLE GEORGIA
as 5:2020cv00438
Defendant:
SANDERSVILLE GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
VICTOR WALKER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lashley v. Walker
as 1:2019cv01785
Respondent:
Victor Walker and James Deal
Petitioner:
Omar Lashley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Badovinac et al v. Wyndham Destinations, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv00649
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc., Wyndham Destinations, Inc. and Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Badonivac, Michael Badonivac, John Colley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
