Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Da Silva Vieira, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4065
Petitioner:
RENNAN DA SILVA VIEIRA, YASMIN DIAS FERREIRA and SANTIAGO DIAS DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vieira Santos, et al v. Garland
as 23-2013
Petitioner:
MARYANGELA VIEIRA SANTOS and D.L.V.D.L.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Vaz Vieira v. Peixe Pinto
as 8:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Nuno Vaz Vieira
Defendant:
Joana Peixe Pinto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
EAST ATLANTIC SERVICES & TRADING LLC et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv01946
Plaintiff:
EAST ATLANTIC SERVICES & TRADING LLC and CLEVERSON BALTAR VIEIRA
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and CONNIE NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2022cv06979
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vieira Dos Santos v. Garland
as 22-1514
Petitioner:
JHONATA VIEIRA DOS SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Isaac Vieira
as 21-50230
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ISAAC G. VIEIRA
Shrestha et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv04957
Plaintiff:
MONI SHRESTHA, SUNIL KARMACHARYA, HANYATH FEYICHITAN SOUMANOU and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, USCIS and United Stats Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Vieira v. De Souza
as 21-1522
Petitioner:
DANILO DE PAULA VIEIRA
Respondent:
DJAIANE AQUINO DE SOUZA
Stoute v. Cone, et al
as 21-1503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN STOUTE
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCESCA L. CONE, GARETH W. NOTIS, MORRISON MAHONEY LLP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
