Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. Wilber Vigil-Benitez
as 22-3031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Wilber Vigil-Benitez, also known as Solitario
FOURSTAR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv02818
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, JR.
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ANGIE WAGNER, DEWAYNE HABERSHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DORSEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2019cv00191
Defendant:
JONATHAN LAUDERDALE, GREGORY SHIFFER, BROCK VIGIL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DORSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ISAAC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
WENDELL D. ISAAC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. SIXTH DISTRICT VICE UNIT et al
as 1:2014mc01130
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES MURPHY, JR.
Defendant:
SIXTH DISTRICT VICE UNIT, B. VIGIL and L. SHEFMAN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY v. HYNES & WALLER, INCORPORATED
as 1:2013cv01714
Plaintiff:
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
HYNES & WALLER, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY v. D.A.C. ACQUISITION COMPANY, L.L.C.
as 1:2011cv00400
Plaintiff:
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
AMERICAN MECHANICAL SERVICES OF MARYLAND, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. ARAGON et al
as 1:2009cv02010
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GOMEZ and LYNETTE GOMEZ
Defendant:
ROBERT ARAGON, SANDRA PRICE, F. DOUGLAS MOELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY v. A.G. CONSTRUCTION COROPRATION et al
as 1:2008cv02077
Plaintiff:
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
A.G. CONSTRUCTION COROPRATION and ALEX HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
