Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doctor John's Inc. v. Village of Cahokia et al
as 3:2018cv00170
Plaintiff:
Doctor John's Inc.
Defendant:
Village of Cahokia and Curtis McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Doctor John's Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00171
Defendant:
Curtis Village of Cahokia, Illinois, Curtis McCall and Doctor John's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hadley v. Larson et al
as 3:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hadley
Defendant:
Dr. Larson, Phillip McLaurin, Village of Cahokia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Village of Cahokia, Illinois et al
as 3:2015cv01030
Plaintiff:
James Allen
Defendant:
Village of Cahokia, Illinois, Curtis L McCall, Jr., Phyllis Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Village of Cahokia, Illinois et al
as 3:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Nichols
Defendant:
Village of Cahokia, Illinois, Curtis L McCall, Jr., Jeffery K. Radford, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Village of Cahokia, Illinois et al
as 3:2015cv00986
Plaintiff:
Joe Morgan
Defendant:
Village of Cahokia, Illinois, Curtis L McCall, Jr., Jeffery K. Radford, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McClelland et al v Village of Cahokia, Illinois et al
as 3:2015cv00985
Plaintiff:
Sandra McClelland , Craig S Greer , Jeanetta R. Perkins and others
Defendant:
Village of Cahokia, Illinois, Curtis L McCall, Jr., Jeffery K. Radford, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Canty v. Bowers et al
as 3:2014cv00666
Plaintiff:
Raymond Canty
Defendant:
Keith Bowers, Damon Pipkens, Village of Cahokia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
