Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Nash v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05055
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Companaro and Joe Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rothrock v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04959
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Companaro and others
Plaintiff:
John David Rothrock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorning v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04910
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Vincent Companaro
Plaintiff:
Michael D Thorning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillman v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04582
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Companaro and Joe Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Adell Tillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kallas v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04580
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Companaro and Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Allen Kallas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delacruz v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04555
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joe Arpaio and Vincent Companaro
Plaintiff:
William Louis Delacruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04557
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Companaro and Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rex Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyston v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04549
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Companaro and Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Mark Alfonso Boyston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04554
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Companaro and Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Theo Walker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desselle v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04550
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Companaro and Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
John S Desselle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
