Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Kenneth Lecky v. VA State Board of Elections
as 18-1020
Intervenor / Appellee:
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, ROBERT THOMAS, JR., DANIELLE J. DAVIS and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG FILLER, in his official capacities as Chairman of the Stafford County Electoral Board, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS, MARC C. HOFFMAN, in his official capacity as Director of Elections and General Registrar of the City of Fredericksburg and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH J. LECKY, AMY RIDDERHOF, PHILLIP RIDDERHOF, (Phil") and others
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bethune-Hill et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 3:2014cv00852
Plaintiff:
Golden Bethune-Hill, Christa Brooks, Chauncey Brown and others
Defendant:
Virginia State Board of Elections, James B. Alcorn, Virginia Department of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
OneVirginia2021: Virginians for Fair Redistricting
Intervenor Defendant:
Virginia House of Delegates, William J. Howell and M. Kirkland Cox
Special Master:
Bernard Grofman
Interested Party:
Virginia State Conference of NAACP Branches, New Virginia Majority, Princeton University and others
Petitioner:
Wakeel Abdul-Sabur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langhorne et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 3:2013cv00702
Defendant:
Kimberly Bowers, Virginia State Board of Elections, Charlie Judd and others
Plaintiff:
Arelia S. Langhorne and Howard M. Butler
Petitioner:
William J. Howell, Virginia House of Delegates, Kathy J. Byron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
