Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Henry v. 1-800 Contacts et al
as 2:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Henry
Defendant:
1-800 Contacts, Inc. and Vision Direct
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Thompson et al v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. et al
as UT/2:16-cv-01183
Plaintiff:
J Thompson and William P. Duncanson
Defendant:
1-800 Contacts and Vision Direct
Movant:
Pam Stillings
HENRY v. 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. et al
as DC/1:17-cv-00117
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HENRY
Defendant:
1-800 CONTACTS, INC. , VISION DIRECT, INC. and DOES 1-15
HENRY v. 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HENRY
Defendant:
1-800 CONTACTS, INC. and Vision Direct, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Thompson et al v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01183
Plaintiff:
J Thompson and William P. Duncanson
Defendant:
1-800 Contacts and Vision Direct
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson et al v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02552
Plaintiff:
J Thompson and William P. Duncanson
Defendant:
1-800 Contacts, Inc. , Vision Direct, Inc. and Does 1-15
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soverain Software LLC v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 6:2012cv00153
Plaintiff:
Soverain Software LLC
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Walgreens.com, Inc., Beauty.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
1-800 Contacts v. Drugstore.com, Inc., et al
as 08-4177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
1-800 CONTACTS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
DRUGSTORE.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation and VISION DIRECT, a Texas corporation
1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Vision Direct, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01949
Plaintiff:
1-800 Contacts, Inc. and 1-800 Contacts, Inc.
Defendant:
Vision Direct, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
1-800 Contacts v. Drugstore.com et al
as 2:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
1-800 Contacts, 1-800 Contacts and 1-800 Contacts
Defendant:
Drugstore.com and Vision Direct
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
