Cases 1 - 10 of 29
DigiMedia Tech, LLC v. Arashi Vision Inc. dba Insta360
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
DigiMedia Tech, LLC
Defendant:
Arashi Vision Inc. dba Insta360
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nolasco v. National Vision Inc
as 3:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rosario Nolasco
Defendant:
National Vision Inc doing business as America's Best Contacts & Eyeglasses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Rice v. Empact Vision Inc.
as 7:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Charles Rice
Defendant:
Empact Vision Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Arashi Vision Inc.
as 6:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Arashi Vision Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Daniels v. Optel Group USA Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02120
Plaintiff:
Donnie Daniels
Defendant:
Optel Group USA Inc., Optel Vision, Inc. and Optel Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wet Sounds, Inc. v. Powerbass USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03258
Plaintiff:
Wet Sounds, Inc.
Defendant:
Powerbass USA, Inc., DEDC, Inc. doing business as DOW Electronics and AV Audio Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Eschenbach Optik of America, Inc. v. Mattingly Low Vision, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00307
Plaintiff:
Eschenbach Optik of America, Inc.
Defendant:
Mattingly Low Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
The Lasik Vision Institute, LLC v. January, et al
as 4:2017cv00958
Plaintiff:
The Lasik Vision Institure LLC
Defendant:
Bruce E January , LCA-Vision Inc. , Vision Acquisition LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carriage Services, Inc v. Financial Visions, Inc.
as 4:2015cv02789
Petitioner:
Carriage Services, Inc
Defendant:
Financial Visions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
