Cases 11 - 20 of 83
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Cicalhua et al
as 2:2020cv10970
Defendant:
Gabriel Cicalhua individually and d/b/a El Rey De Los Mariscos, Carla Vivas individually and d/b/a El Rey De Los Mariscos, Gabriel Cicalhua individually doing business as El Rey De Los Mariscos and others
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
USA v. Abeth Laynes
as 20-3968
Defendant / Appellee:
ABETH VIVAS LAYNES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Raul Vivas
as 20-55891
Defendant / Appellant:
RAUL VIVAS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joel Vivas-Martinez v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 20-12848
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOEL VIVAS-MARTINEZ
Gilber Elias-Vivas v. William Barr
as 20-70626
Petitioner:
GILBER ELIAS-VIVAS, AKA Gilber Ellas-Vivar
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Chevron Corporation v. Donziger
as 19-4091
Defendant:
Omayihue Baihua, Daniel Carlos Lusitand Yaiguaje, Maria Magdalena Rodri Barcenes and others
Respondent:
Andrew Woods, Laura J. Garr and H5
Counter Claimant:
Donziger & Associates, PLLC, The Law Offices of Steven R. Donziger, Ann Maest and others
Plaintiff:
Chevron Corporation
Doe et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2019cv01743
Defendant:
United States of America, Donald Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Latino Network, Brenda Villarruel, Jane Doe #3 and others
Amicus Curiae:
Centro Latino Americano, Oregon Interfaith Movement for Immigrant Justice, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706
McClenon et al v. Postmates Inc.
as 1:2019cv06415
Defendant:
Postmates Inc.
Petitioner:
Adrian Aponte, Antonio Cordova, Alejandra Monsalve and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
