Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Arthur Torlucci v. W. Duncan
as 13-56732
Petitioner - Appellee: ARTHUR TORLUCCI
Respondent - Appellee: W. A. DUNCAN
Arthur Torlucci v. W. A. Duncan
as 13-56325
Petitioner - Appellant: ARTHUR TORLUCCI
Respondent - Appellee: W. A. DUNCAN
Sargeant v. Haynes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2012cv03555
Plaintiff: Roy Patrick Sargeant
Defendant: Stacey D Haynes, W Micheal Duncan, United States of America Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prince Shotwell, Jr. v. W. Duncan, et al
as 11-15315
Plaintiff - Appellant: PRINCE DEON SHOTWELL, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: W. A. DUNCAN, Director, J. CLUDY, M.D. and B. ZIKA, Ph.D.
Kitchen v. Duncan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01567
Plaintiff: Thomas Kitchen
Defendant: W. A. Duncan, Edgar Clark, Joseph Obaiza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
-CW Marcos S Mendoza v. W A Duncan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2000cv04206
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of California and W A Duncan
Petitioner: Marcos S Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael McCord v. W. Duncan
as 10-16046
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL ANTHONY MCCORD
Respondent - Appellee: W. A. DUNCAN
Norman Williams v. W A Duncan, et al
as 2:1998cv05538
Respondent: W A Duncan and Daniel E Lungren, .
Petitioner: Norman Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shotwell v. Duncan, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00401
Plaintiff: Prince Deon Shotwell, Jr
Defendant: W A Duncan, J. Cludy and B. Zika
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tommy Fryman v. W Duncan, et al
as 10-15371
Petitioner - Appellant: TOMMY LEE FRYMAN
Respondent - Appellee: W A DUNCAN, Warden and JEANNE S. WOODARD, Director, California Department of Corrections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?