Cases 1 - 10 of 16
James Brown v. D. Leu
as 23-6120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES W. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. LEU, Warden, D. SMITH, Captain, R. CARMONA, Unit Manager and others
Terry Ofori v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6914
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY K. OFORI
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the VDOC, MR. WENDELL W. PIXLEY, Warden of SIISP, MR. M. A. BAILEY, Assistant Warden of SIISP and others
Somchai Noonsab v. W.T. Brown
as 22-6771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE W. BROWN, MELANIE A. SHEKITA, MICHAEL HOWELL and others
Rhonda Kirschmann v. State of Virginia
as 19-2335
Defendant / Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT, NANCY PARR, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Chesapeake, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA KIRSCHMANN, and those similarly situated
Ray Brown v. Earl Barksdale
as 17-6226
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAY W. BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
EARL BARKSDALE, Warden
Somchai Noonsab v. USDC EDNC
as 16-7430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, W. BROWN, STEPHEN M. RUSSELL and others
Somchai Noonsab v. NC Government
as 16-7005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA, W. BROWN, STEPHEN MCDANIEL RUSSELL, SR. and others
Lester Hayes v. W. Brown
as 16-6431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER M. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
W. BROWN, Correction Officer Segregation
Defendant:
C. ST. JEAN, Director of Armor Medical Company, VCU/MCV HOSPITAL, Hospital, PIXLEY, Warden and others
Dennis Van Dyke v. Scott Slusser
as 15-6938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Pro Se Writer Attorney At Law Prophet Pastor Rabbi
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SLUSSER, SEAN F. PERRIN, Attorney - Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
