Cases 11 - 20 of 214
Guillermo Trujillo v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 21-15768
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BALLESTORO, C/O at KVSP, W. J. SULLIVAN, Chief Deputy- Warden, C. PFEIFFER, Chief Deputy- Warden at KVSP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO, AKA Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Guillermo Trujillo v. C. Pfeifer, et al
as 21-15478
Defendant / Appellee:
C. PFEIFER, Chief Deputy Warden at KVSP, W. J. SULLIVAN, Chief Deputy Warden at KVSP and T. S. ARLITZ, Associate Warden at KVSP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO, AKA Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
De Shun Bowers v. USDC-CALA
as 21-70364
Not Classified By Court:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden and In re: DE SHUN BOWERS
Petitioner:
DE SHUN BOWERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
William Rouser v. D. Crounse, et al
as 21-15037
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIELLE R. HEMPLE, W. J. SULLIVAN, D. CROUNSE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROUSER
(PC) Rogers v. Campbell et al
as 1:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Captain K. Nouwels, Warden W. J. Sullivan, Warden B. Cates and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeRoy Hughes v. W.J. Sullivan
as 2:2020cv11299
Respondent:
W. J. Sullivan
Petitioner:
LeRoy Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Relmon Davis, III v. W. Sullivan
as 20-17375
Petitioner / Appellant:
RELMON H. DAVIS III
Respondent / Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden
De Shun Bowers v. USDC-CALA
as 20-73244
Not Classified By Court:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden and In re: DE SHUN BOWERS
Petitioner:
DE SHUN BOWERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
(HC) Garner v. Cates
as 1:2020cv01403
Respondent:
W. J. Sullivan and Brian Cates
Petitioner:
Mark Erwin Garner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jessie Flores v. W. Sullivan
as 20-55817
Respondent / Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSIE JAMES FLORES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
