Cases 1 - 10 of 321
Raghunath v. State of New York et, al et al
as 1:2023cv04622
Plaintiff:
Ishwardat Raghunath
Defendant:
State of New York et, al, City of New York, et al, County of Queens, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Gantner et al
as 9:2021cv01257
Plaintiff:
Germaine Manuel Aybar Garcia
Defendant:
Mary Ann Gantner, Daniel W. Kelly, Roger Sagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Garland et al
as 9:2021cv01255
Plaintiff:
Germaine Manuel Aybar Garcia
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Congress, Roger Sagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Gantner et al
as 1:2021cv06423
Plaintiff:
Germaine Manuel Aybar Garcia
Defendant:
Mary Ann Gantner, Daniel W. Kelly, Roger Sagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv03119
Plaintiff:
Germaine Manuel Aybar Garcia
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Congress, Roger Sagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Koh v. Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10296
Plaintiff:
Chan-Hee Koh
Defendant:
Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., Emmanuel Dulac, Meenu Chhabra and others
Merritt v. Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10275
Defendant:
Emmanuel Dulac, Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., Meenu Chhabra and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Merritt
Dreyer v. Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05193
Defendant:
Emmanuel Dulac, Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., Meenu Chhabra and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Dreyer
Beck v. Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08783
Defendant:
Emmanuel Dulac, Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., Meenu Chhabra and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Beck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Straube v. Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08653
Defendant:
Emmanuel Dulac, Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., Meenu Chhabra and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Straube
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
